Trump touts clash-of-religions worldview after attacks in Europe #Trump

0
124
Police and emergency workers stand next to a crashed truck at the site of an accident at a Christmas market on Breitscheidplatz square near the fashionable Kurfuerstendamm avenue in the west of Berlin, Germany, December 19, 2016. REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch

Cii Radio| Ayesha Ismail| 22 December 2016| 22 Rabi ul Awal 1438

US president-elect brands truck attack on Christmas market in Berlin as latest outrage in what he sees as global religious war

Berlin police have yet to even put their hands on the right suspect after a truck ploughed into a Christmas market, leaving 12 people dead.

But Donald Trump has no doubts about what happened.

Just three hours after Monday’s apparent attack, the US president-elect branded it the latest outrage in what he sees as a global religious war.

His language was a dramatic departure from how Western leaders generally respond to militant attacks, but reflected the tone of his campaign.

“Innocent civilians were murdered in the streets as they prepared to celebrate the Christmas holiday,” he declared, in a statement. “ISIS and other Islamist terrorists continually slaughter Christians in their communities and places of worship as part of their global jihad.”

Trump made this case before German police released for lack of evidence a Pakistani asylum-seeker who was arrested after the truck attack and before authorities identified Tunisian Anis Amri as the main suspect.

And he spoke even before Amaq, an IS-linked news agency, claimed that the Islamic State group was behind the ramming attack.

Trump resorted to similar language to condemn the murder, on the same day, of Russia’s ambassador to Turkey by a “radical Islamic terrorist.”

His decision to focus on the presumed religion of the attackers was a deliberately chosen contrast with the policy of outgoing President Barack Obama.

The seasoned US leader called Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel on Tuesday to offer his condolences on “the horrific apparent terrorist attack.”

Obama’s administration is fighting militant groups like the so-called Islamic State, but doing so under the banner of “countering violent extremism.”

Muslim ban
He and his generals and diplomats praise the Muslim governments that have joined in the struggle and insist the militants do not represent a religion.

Secretary of State John Kerry has gone as far as declaring the Islamic State group “apostates” who have twisted the message of a great faith.

Trump, however, has a different set of advisers and apparent beliefs: Extremism can only be defeated if we identify it as springing from Islam itself.

During his campaign he proposed a total ban on Muslims travelling to the United States, at least “until we can figure out what the hell is going on.”

His national security adviser, maverick former general Michael Flynn, has argued that Islam is not even a religion but a “political ideology.”

“They have declared war against us,” Flynn said in August. “And our government does not allow us to talk about this enemy.”

Flynn has also compared Islamism to a disease.

“This is Islamism,” he said of the threat. “It is a vicious cancer inside the body of 1.7 billion people on this planet and it has to be excised. We should not fear this idea. We should define it clearly and go after it.”

But Trump’s clash of civilizations narrative does not just stem from the advice of a former soldier who fought militants in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Another of his closest advisers, incoming White House chief of strategy Steve Bannon embodies a nationalist view with roots in hard right ideology.

Bannon has taken a break from running Breitbart, a favorite news platform of the white nationalists to work with Trump.

Breitbart’s homepage was dominated on Tuesday by the news from Germany, prominently featuring criticism of Merkel’s open door to Muslim refugees.

Source – Middle East eye